Saturday, 23 November 2024
USA & CANADA

USA & CANADA (901)

Latest News

Trump: Migrants U.S. invaders to be denied rights

Monday, 25 June 2018 09:59 Written by

US President Donald Trump on Sunday described migrants coming to the U.S. invaders, who should be deprived of legal due process.

The latest statement reinforced his hardline stand despite an about-face on family separations that has seen more than 500 children reunited with relatives.

Trying to stanch the flow of tens of thousands of migrants from Central America and Mexico arriving at the southern border every month, Trump in early May had ordered that all adults crossing illegally would be arrested, and their children held separately as a result.

After images of children in chain-link enclosures sparked domestic and global outrage, the president ended the separation practice but has continued his hardline talk on immigration.

He sees the issue as crucial ahead of midterm congressional elections in November.

“We cannot allow all of these people to invade our Country,” Trump said Sunday on Twitter.

“When somebody comes in, we must immediately, with no Judges or Court Cases, bring them back from where they came,” said Trump, suggesting they be handled without the due legal process guaranteed for “any person” by the US Constitution.

Nearly all of the arriving families have officially requested asylum.

“Our system is a mockery to good immigration policy and Law and Order,” said Trump, who has repeatedly tried to link immigrants with crime.

His remarks came after the Department of Homeland Security released its first official data since Trump ended the family separations on Wednesday.

It said 522 children separated as part of “zero tolerance” have been reunited with their families, but another 2,053 separated minors remained in the care of the US Department of Health and Human Services as of Wednesday.

“The United States government knows the location of all children in its custody and is working to reunite them with their families,” the department said in a statement late Saturday.

Fleeing from impoverished Central America, the arrivals say they are seeking a better life and also a refuge from criminal gangs terrorizing their region, which has one of the world’s highest murder rates.

Central American migrants deported from the US without their children have spoken of their anguish at seeing families split under the “zero tolerance” approach.

Ever Sierra, deported after trying to enter the US, told AFP he planned to try again in a few days.

He arrived back in Honduras with his eight-month-old daughter’s shoes hanging from his backpack. She was being held in a detention center in McAllen, Texas, along with her mother.

Benjamin Raymundo, a 33-year-old deported back to Guatemala, told AFP he left his home country in April with his son Roberto, aged five, but the pair were separated when immigration officers in California stopped them.N

Trump Promises Order To End Family Separations

Wednesday, 20 June 2018 22:04 Written by

United States President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he is preparing to sign an executive order to halt the separation of migrant children from their parents on the US border, as global criticism of the practice mounted.

The announcement came after his administration was besieged from all sides over the policy, launched in early May, to arrest anyone crossing the border illegally.

That crackdown sent the adults for prosecution as criminals — and removed their children from their care, sending them to tent camps and other facilities where they were unable to contact their loved ones.

As images and accounts of sobbing children wrested from their parents circulated, Trump’s own Republican Party began to rebel, prompting him to do an about-face after days of saying it was up to Congress to act, and pledge executive action.

“We want security for the country,” Trump said at a meeting with Republican lawmakers at the White House. “And we will have that at the same time we have compassion, we want to keep families together.”

“We are signing an executive order in a little while” to end the practice, Trump said.

The president, however, made clear he was not easing up on his determination to shut down the border to illegal immigration, calling it a source of rampant crime and drugs.

“We still have to maintain toughness, or our country will be overrun by people, by crime, by all of the things that we don’t stand for and we don’t want,” he said.

‘Deeply disturbing’ images

As countries marked World Refugee Day Wednesday, British Prime Minister Theresa May, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the Council of Europe and Pope Francis all took issue with Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy.

May said images of migrant children kept in cage-like units were “deeply disturbing,” and the Council of Europe, a global human rights watchdog, said Trump had abdicated any claim to moral leadership in the world.

“A person’s dignity does not depend on them being a citizen, a migrant, or a refugee. Saving the life of someone fleeing war and poverty is an act of humanity,” the pope said on Twitter.

Trump continued to blame opposition Democrats and the media for the crisis on the southern US border.

After a downturn last year, since October, the number of migrants seeking to cross the southwest US border from impoverished Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, as well as from Mexico, has surged.

From March to May this year, more than 50,000 people a month were apprehended for illegally crossing the border from Mexico. About 15 per cent of those are arriving as families, and eight per cent as unaccompanied children.

Migrants seeking asylum

Nearly all of the families, and many others are officially asking for asylum, citing the incessant violence in their home countries.

Aiming to deter more arrivals, in early May, the Trump administration announced it would arrest and criminally charge all adults.

Meanwhile, any children entering the country with them, including infants, would be taken away and held separately.

The issue has struck an emotional chord, amid accounts of children screaming and crying in the tent camps prepared for them in southern Texas.

“We were outside, and you could hear voices of children that appeared to be playing or laughing, but when they opened the door, we saw around 20 to 30 10-year-old boys in one of these chain-link enclosures, and they were crying and screaming and asking for their mothers,” pediatrician Marsha Griffin told AFP in El Paso.

The government has said the families could be reunited eventually after the parents were processed in court.

But on Tuesday, a top official from the Department of Health and Human Services, charged with caring for more than 2,300 such children taken since May 5, admitted they have no system in place to do so.

Ahead of Trump’s statement, House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan said the House will vote Thursday on legislation that will stop the family separation.

“We don’t think families should be separated, period. We’ve seen the videos, heard the audio,” Ryan said.

Under the legislation, Ryan said, “We are going to take action to keep families together while we enforce our immigration laws.”

But it wasn’t clear that the Republican bill, which includes other key immigration law changes, would pass, possibly precipitating Trump’s action.

AFP

U.S.-Canada agreement on refugees is now unconstitutional

Wednesday, 20 June 2018 06:51 Written by

Since President Donald Trump’s election there has been much discussion about the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement. Under this agreement, asylum seekers at land border crossings are turned back to the United States without having their refugee claims heard in Canada.

The 2002 agreement only applies at official land border crossings. Thousands of asylum seekers who are already in the United States circumvent the agreement by crossing the Canadian border at irregular sites, including Roxham Road in Québec. Politicians continue to debate how to best respond.

The Liberal government wants to renegotiate an expanded agreement — though recent events suggest international negotiations with the U.S. are fraught with difficulties. It’s also safe to assume Trump will not agree to expand an international treaty preventing asylum seekers from leaving the U.S. for Canada.

The opposition Conservatives say Canada should unilaterally expand the agreement by declaring the entire U.S. border to be an official border crossing. This is a fantasy. Canada cannot send people to the United States without the U.S. agreeing any more than other countries can send people to Canada without permission.

The NDP proposes scrapping or suspending the agreement, arguing that the U.S. is no longer safe for refugees.

On this point, the New Democrats are supported by Amnesty International, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and over 200 law professors across the country. But civil servants are worried this might increase the number of asylum claimants coming to Canada, straining the refugee determination system’s limited resources.

Illegal U.S. asylum policies

These political debates are now largely irrelevant. People can reasonably disagree about whether the agreement was ever good policy, but after a series of announcements by U.S. officials in recent weeks, the agreement cannot stand constitutional scrutiny in Canada.

As has been widely reported, the U.S. has instituted a policy of detaining asylum seekers and separating children from their families. This policy aims to discourage irregular migration. It is also illegal.


Read more: Chaos coming to Canada after U.S. decision on refugees


The policy violates international refugee law, which prohibits penalties on asylum seekers for irregular arrival. It violates international human rights law, which protects the integrity of the family. It violates international law relating to children, which requires the bests interests of children be considered when applying government policy and that children only be detained as a last resort.

Beyond being illegal, it’s also just plain wrong. Canada’s experience with the devastating intergenerational harms caused by the shameful removal of Indigenous children from their families offers a window into just how immoral this policy is.

If that wasn’t enough, the Trump administration announced on June 11 that refugees facing persecution due to domestic violence or gang violence will no longer receive asylum. Again, this leaves the U.S. in breach of international refugee law. It also conflicts with Canadian interpretations of refugee law.

Putting these announcements together, here is where we stand: some people who meet the refugee definition under Canadian law, if sent back to the U.S., are likely to be detained, separated from their children and deported to face persecution.

In this context, there is now no longer any question the agreement — at least as it is applied to refugees facing domestic violence or gang related violence — is unconstitutional under Canadian law.

Safe Third Country Agreement Unlawful

Regardless of political persuasion, no one who takes Canadian constitutional law seriously can contend Canada can lawfully send a person who meets the Canadian refugee definition to a country where they will be detained, separated from their children and then deported back to the country where they face persecution.

In this photo from April 17, 1982, the Queen and Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau sign Canada’s constitutional proclamation. Guarantees under Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms are now threatened by the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement. THE CANADIAN PRESS/File photo

Indeed, it may not be possible for Department of Justice lawyers to even argue in court that the agreement is constitutional without breaching professional obligations as lawyers and civil servants. And any lawyers asked to do so should take a long hard look at the experience of others who have defended the undefendable elsewhere — such as lawyers who argued that torture was a lawful response to national security concerns or lawyers who defended apartheid in South Africa.

So there are now only two options. The government can take proactive measures and suspend or scrap the agreement — thereby restoring the orderly processing of refugees that existed prior to the agreement — or the government can wait for the courts to strike the agreement down as unconstitutional.

Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau gave Canada the Charter of Rights and Freedomsin 1982. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau must now decide whether his government will take steps to protect those rights or whether he will do nothing and make the courts do it for him.

Either way, the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement is dead.

 

 

Author:  :  Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Canada

Credit link: https://theconversation.com/u-s-canada-agreement-on-refugees-is-now-unconstitutional-98227<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/98227/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" />

Nigerian-Canadian Citizen Illegally Detained By Border Patrol For 8 Months

Friday, 15 June 2018 22:00 Written by

According to the Guardian (UK), a Nigerian, Olajide Ogunye, who has Canadian citizenship, was detained for 8 months by Canadian border agents despite showing them his papers. 

 
 
A Canadian man is suing the country’s government after he was arrested by border agents and detained for eight months – despite producing evidence of his citizenship.
 
Olajide Ogunye, 47, is seeking $10m in compensation from the Canadian government after he spent months incarcerated in what his lawyer has described as a “profoundly disturbing” case of mistaken identity.
 
Ogunye was approached by border agents and detained outside his Toronto home in June 2016, even though he produced citizenship papers and a government-issued health card.
 
The agents disputed the validity of the documents and brought him to a detention facility near Toronto Pearson airport, where they fingerprinted him and alleged his prints matched those of a fraudulent refugee claimant who was deported to Nigeria in the 1990s.
 
“It is shocking,” said Adam Hummel, Ogunye’s lawyer. “Even people who are having their citizenship revoked … are not detained like this.”
 
The results of the fingerprint analysis – which Hummel says were never shown to his client – were contradicted by numerous sworn affidavits by friends and neighbours who had known Ogunye for years.
 
Ogunye, who immigrated to Canada from Nigeria with his family and became a citizen in 1996, was moved between Maplehurst correctional facility and Central East correctional centre.
 
Near-constant security lockdowns – a problem plaguing prisons and jails throughout the country – prevented him from making contact with family members. Traumatized by his detention, he was placed on suicide watch.
 
“One time, for the whole month, I was crying nonstop. I was crying continuously,” he told the CBC. “The nurse had to give me depression pills to make me calm down.”
 
Ogunye was released in February 2017. Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) alleged fraud and impersonation by Ogunye as justification for his detention.
 
CBSA said in a statement that it had received Ogunye’s claim and was reviewing the matter, but that it would be “inappropriate” to comment further.
 
Targeted arrests, like the one that ensnared Ogunye, are common for clearing a backlog of immigration violations, said a number of lawyers working in immigration and refugee law.
 
But the arrest of a Canadian citizen by border guards was nearly unheard of, said Max Chaudhary, a Toronto-based immigration lawyer. “That’s simply not what [border] officers do. Their mandate is not with Canadian citizens.”
 
Chaudhary speculated that if border officials believed Ogunye was a foreign national or permanent resident violating immigration laws, it could explain the duration of the detention – and the slow pace in which investigation unfolded.
 
“It seems quite incredible there could be a case of mistaken identity that could not have been cleared up in a faster amount of time, having this person deprived of his liberty for eight months,” he said.
 
Ogunye’s case was indicative of a broken system, said Lorne Waldman, a professor of immigration law at Osgoode Hall. Despite years of lobbying for oversight of the agency’s conduct – and assurances from the public safety minister, Ralph Gooddale, that such mechanisms would be put in place – Wadlman said no progress has been made
 
“Because there’s no oversight, there’s nobody who reviews the conduct of CBSA officers and this matter was allowed to drag on for months and months. It’s extremely unacceptable.”
 
Hummel and his client charge that the government breached Ogunye’s constitutional rights; he filed the case in Ontario superior court on 30 May.
 
“The very fact that this happened, someone who was approached and showed he was a Canadian citizen, means that it could happen to anyone if this is how [border agents] are operating,” he said.

Popular News

    felicilin at 20-11-2024 09:47 AM (6 hrs ago)    (f)  …
  Manhattan prosecutors have announced they will oppose President-elect Trump’s…
A spokesperson for the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) says…
Former US President and Republican candidate, Donald Trump said he…

Trump aide Manafort sent to jail

Friday, 15 June 2018 21:20 Written by

onald Trump’s former campaign chief, Paul Manafort was sent to jail Friday pending trial on a series of federal charges.

Manafort, who is facing money laundering and tax evasion charges among others, was the first former Trump campaign aide to be jailed in the sprawling probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller since May 2017.

The revocation of Manafort’s bail was a fresh sign of the looming collision course between Mueller and Trump, with the White House increasingly worried that the president could face obstruction of justice charges and an impeachment effort in Congress.

Manafort, 69, had been under house arrest while awaiting trial in both the US capital and Virginia. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges against him, which also include obstruction of justice.

Trump condemned the treatment of Manafort, a veteran Washington political consultant, as he sought to paint Mueller’s team as well as the Federal Bureau of Investigation — which Mueller once ran — as deeply biased and illegitimate.

“Wow, what a tough sentence for Paul Manafort, who has represented Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole and many other top political people and campaigns,” Trump wrote on Twitter.

“Didn’t know Manafort was the head of the Mob,” he said. “Very unfair!”

Earlier, Trump lashed out at the entire investigation, labelling it a “ridiculous witch hunt” after a Justice Department watchdog report revealed that several FBI investigators had sent anti-Trump text messages during the 2016 campaign.

“There was no collusion, there was no obstruction, and if you read the report… what you’ll really see is bias against me,” Trump said.

Manafort, who is facing trial later this year on money laundering charges involving his work for Ukraine that predated the 2016 presidential election, saw his bail revoked by Judge Amy Berman Jackson over claims he was trying to influence witnesses in his case.

He is one of 20 people and three companies already indicted by Mueller, who is investigating whether members of the campaign colluded with Russia during and after the election.

Mueller’s team has been seeking to interview Trump as well, and questions they have submitted to the White House indicate that they are also investigating whether Trump has illegally interfered with the probe.

On Friday, Trump sought to make use of the Justice Department inspector general’s report on the 2016 investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state to erode confidence in Mueller’s operation.

While the IG report made almost no mention of Mueller or any alleged wrongdoing by Trump, the president claimed it “exonerates” him, while his lawyer Rudy Giuliani said Mueller and his team themselves should be investigated.

“The report yesterday may be more important than anything. It totally exonerates me,” Trump told journalists in front of the White House.

The report faulted the FBI and its former director James Comey, whom Trump fired in May 2017, over the handling of the Clinton email probe.

It said Comey, who cleared Clinton of allegations of mishandling classified materials, was insubordinate and guilty of bad judgment.

It also showed several agents involved in both that investigation and the subsequent Russia meddling probe repeatedly expressing anti-Trump bias in private text messages.

“That is probably the tip of the iceberg,” Trump said. “There was total bias, I mean total bias.”

He referred to Comey and other senior FBI officials as “the scum at the top” of the bureau and as “total thieves.”

*AFP

Ford Nation rises again: What Doug Ford means for Ontario

Wednesday, 13 June 2018 21:57 Written by

Up until a few months ago, discussions of Doug Ford becoming premier of Ontario were relegated to amusing hypothetical conversations. However, the hypothetical “what if” has become reality.

The man many view as a Canadian Donald Trump has seized on a unique political opportunity to dethrone the province’s Liberal party and reassert Progressive Conservative control over the most populous province in Canada with a majority government.

For some, the prospects of Ford’s tenure as premier are concerning if not downright frightening. There is an understandable fear that Ford’s brand of right-wing politics will bring sweeping reforms to social programs while undoing many of the progressive policies enacted under Kathleen Wynne’s Liberal government.

While it’s impossible to predict precisely how his premiership will unfold, we can look to his rhetoric during the election campaign as well as his late brother Rob Ford’s tenure as mayor of Toronto for an indication of what might loom ahead.

Populism in the 2017 Ontario election

Doug Ford’s campaign platform was based on a number of well-worn conservative policy positions. From scrapping the carbon tax to reducing corporate tax rates and promising to balance Ontario’s budget within two years, Ford’s campaign, at least in terms of substance, relies on many of the same ideas and policy positions as other Canadian right-wing politicians.

What marks his campaign as unique, at least in Canada, is that these positions are couched within the language of populism. Ford has offered his candidacy and his ideas as a way to expel Liberal elites from power, remove the influence of “radical special interests” and, most importantly, to create a government that works on behalf of the people.

Ford casts his ballot in Toronto on June 7, 2018. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette

The populist framing of Ford’s campaign offers a reimagination of politics as a fight between hard-working, tax-paying citizens against out-of-touch “elites” beholden to special interests.

While there is no crystal ball to predict how successful Ford will be in following through with the specific promises outlined in his campaign platform, Ontario residents can expect that the populist discourse used to defeat the Liberals and NDP during the campaign will continue, and may even intensify in the future, as Ford pursues his legislative agenda.

With Ford at the helm, we should anticipate a major shift in political discourse over the next four years. Like Donald Trump to the south, Ford represents a different way of doing politics, one where political civility, technocratic knowledge and compromise are replaced by brashness, common-sense solutions and decisive unilateral action.

Ford’s successful positioning of himself as a voice of the people, and the harbinger of common sense, will force his opponents to adapt their strategies to appeal to Ontarians.

If this campaign demonstrated anything, it’s that using Donald Trump as a bogey man to scare voters away from Conservative politicians has only limited sway over the hearts and minds of voters.

For opponents at the centre and on the left of the political spectrum looking to draw support away from Ford, they’ll need to develop strategies to undermine his populist credentials while offering their own policies that appeal to those affected by a sense of disaffection and political alienation.

Rob Ford Redux?

While much has been written about the similarities between Ford and Donald Trump, Doug Ford most closely resembles the populist stylings of his late brother Rob. Doug and Rob Ford share a remarkably similar neoliberal world view centred on halting the proverbial “gravy train” by drastically reducing government spending vis-à-vis the privatization of government services.

The late Rob Ford, then the mayor of Toronto, addresses media at City Hall in November 2013 as Doug Ford, then a city councillor, looks on. Ford, engulfed in scandal, offered an emotional apology for his ‘mistakes,’ among them crack-smoking. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Young

Above all else, Rob and Doug Ford’s politics are shaped by staunch anti-elitism and anti-cosmopolitanism. Under brother Rob, this mixture of populism, neoliberalism and anti-elitism manifested itself in proposals to close homeless shelters, to end HIV/AIDS prevention programs and to cut funding for arenas, playgrounds, pools and day-care centres.

Doug Ford’s campaign for premier evokes the same underlying logic used by his brother as mayor. In order to strengthen his appeal to middle-class taxpayers, Ford has promised not to cut public sector jobs or reduce services. The successful alignment between Ford and the middle class represents a broadening of Ford Nation.

On the outside looking in are those who fall under the banner of special interests: The LGBTQ community, public sector unions and low-income communities.

So if we want to get an indication of where Ontario might be headed with Doug Ford as premier, we ought to examine his brother’s tenure as mayor and the groups alienated by Ford Nation.

While concern about Doug Ford may be widespread, it will likely be the most marginalized among Ontario citizens who are the most adversely effected by his premiership.

 

 

Author:   Ph.D Candidate, University of Guelph

Credit link:  https://theconversation.com/ford-nation-rises-again-what-doug-ford-means-for-ontario-97985<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/97985/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" />

The troubling signs leading up to Anthony Bourdain’s suicide

Monday, 11 June 2018 05:27 Written by

It wasn’t like Anthony Bourdain to skip a good meal.

When the star of “Parts Unknown” didn’t come down from his hotel room for a rustic French dinner Thursday night, it was the first sign something was very wrong.

“We thought it was strange,” waiter Maxime Voinson told The New York Times Saturday, recalling Bourdain’s no-show the night before his suicide.

“Mr. Ripert thought it was strange,” he added, referring to Eric Ripert, the renowned French chef who would find close friend Bourdain upstairs the next morning, hanged in his hotel bathroom.

Ripert, Bourdain and the crew of the CNN show had traveled early last week to the med­ieval village of Kayserberg in northeastern France to film an episode on Alsatian food.

They were staying at Le Chambard, a five-star hotel in a cozy, converted 18th-century mansion.

Pretty much every night, Bourdain and Ripert, the executive chef at Manhattan’s famed Le Bernadin, would dine together at the hotel’s quaint bistro, the Winstub, known for its foie gras and charcuterie.

“Mr. Bourdain knew the chef, Monsieur Nasti,” the waiter told the Times, referring to chef Oliver Nasti.

“He knew the kitchen,” the waiter recalled. “Maybe he went out and ate somewhere else, we said. But we didn’t think much of it.”

Bourdain and Ripert had also eaten breakfast together each morning, again at the Winstub’s big, distressed-wood tables.

Modal Trigger
The Le Chambard hotel in Kaysersberg, FranceAP

“Fresh bread, Viennese pastries, kouglof, panacota verrines, dried fruits,” the hotel lists as breakfast offerings. “Dried fruits, cold cuts, local cheese, fruit salad, butter, honey and a jar of Christine Ferber jam.”

But again, on Friday morning, Bourdain didn’t join him at the table.

“His friend was waiting at breakfast,” the waiter told the Times.

“And waiting and waiting.”

Also waiting, just down the road, was Bourdain’s camera crew.

Master butcher Christine Speisser told People magazine Saturday that the crew had set up to film at an outdoor market in nearby Strasbourg.

Speisser was to show Bourdain around the market, starting at 10 a.m.

“For me, it was something exceptional,” she told People.

“It was an honor to receive chef Bourdain.

“People knew he was coming to the market, and everything was in place, ready to film,” she said.

‘He is the last person in the world I’d imagine to do something like that’

But back at the hotel, Bourdain wasn’t picking up his cellphone. It was 9:30 a.m.

Ripert got up from his table at the Winstub, where he had been set to choose among the breads, pastries and local cheeses with his good friend.

French authorities say a receptionist ­unlocked Bourdain’s hotel-room door.

Inside, the 61-year-old TV host had used the belt of his hotel bathrobe to hang himself in his bathroom.

Ripert found him “unresponsive,” CNN reported.

There were no other signs of violence to Bourdain’s body, local prosecutor Christian de Rocquigny said Saturday.

“There is no element that makes us suspect that someone came into the room at any moment,” the prosecutor added.

De Rocquigny also noted that the suicide appeared to have been an “impulsive act.”

Blood was drawn from the body, and results of screenings for drugs or other toxins will follow in coming days.

“This is solely to give the family more information about the motivations and the cause of death,” de Rocquigny said of the screenings.

“We have no indication that he was consuming alcohol the days before his death or changed his behavior.”

“A visionary,” Nasti, the Chambard chef, would say Saturday of his lost guest and friend, offering his condolences to Bourdain’s family “and all those around the world who he caused to dream.”
Over at the outdoor market, Speisser continued to wait.

Then a production assistant rushed to the scene, announcing, “There’s a big problem.”

“It was like they were all struck by lightning,” Speisser told People magazine Saturday.

“They all just sat on the ground.”

An hour would pass.

“They didn’t say what was happening. They probably didn’t know everything,” Speisser’s friend Christelle Schenck, who had been there to help with the filming, told People.

Finally, “apparently, they need to cancel, we were told,” Schenck said.

“They said we’ll call you back.”

Modal TriggerAnthony Bourdain at "Parts Unknown Last Bite" in Las Vegas in 2013.
Anthony Bourdain at “Parts Unknown Last Bite” in Las Vegas in 2013.WireImage

The crew packed up and left the market.

Reached by The Post Saturday, Bourdain’s mother, Gladys, 83, a longtime Times editor, could barely speak.

“It’s really too difficult,” she said.

“He was an incredible guy. I really can’t talk about him . . . He was brilliant and sharp and funny,” she said.

“He is the last person in the world I’d imagine to do something like that.”

Still, by many accounts, including Ripert’s, Bourdain had not been himself.

There was exhaustion — and darkness.

Gladys Bourdain recalled Ripert telling her that “Tony had been in a dark mood these past couple of days,” Ripert told Bourdain’s mother on Friday according to the Times.

Anthony Bourdain had reportedly kept a brutal work schedule filming “Parts Unknown” in the months before his death and was “absolutely exhausted,” a source told People.

“​His travel schedule was grueling, and he often seemed quite beat-up from it, as anyone would be,” said the source, described by the magazine as having worked closely with Bourdain in the past year.

“He’d put everything into the shoots and then go back to his room to ­isolate.”

Tributes to Bourdain continued to pour in from around the world Saturday.

He had been a devoted student of jiujitsu. Champion Lucas ­Lepri, who trained Bourdain at his home in the Hamptons, recalled how his student surprised him one day with a home-cooked meal inspired by Lepri’s native Brazil.

“I was really moved because he cooked me a feijoada, which is a very special dish from Brazil, made with black beans and pork,” Lepri recalled.

“You have to be really devoted to cook a good feijoada, because you need to simmer the beans all day.

“Tony’s feijoada was incredible. He knew everything about Brazil and Brazilian food, and had traveled all over the country. He told me that the greatest Brazilian chefs came from Minas Gerais, my home state. He really moved me. I’ll never forget him.”

Modal Trigger
Jason Merder (left) and Anthony BourdainJason Merder

Jason Merder, Bourdain’s road manager from 2009 to 2013, remembered it wasn’t all fine dining with the celebrity chef.

“One of the funniest things was Tony’s craving for Popeye’s chicken,” he recalled.

“Every time we flew through Atlanta and had an hour between flights, I would get a look from him. And I was like, ‘Alright, man, we’re going to Popeye’s.’

“It happened every single day, and it didn’t matter what time of day it was.”

Marilyn Hagerty was an octogenarian columnist for the Grand Forks Herald when her 2012 rave review for a new Olive Garden in her small South Dakota town went viral.

As trolls pounced, it was Bourdain who “came to my rescue,” she recalled.

He flew her to New York City, where they had coffee.

“He said he came to realize that what I do is a reflection of how people eat,” she said.

And he surprised her, too.

“I found him to be not a wild, reckless character of a person, as I had expected,” Hagerty told Time magazine. “He was nothing but kind and a gentleman.”

Additional reporting by Georgett Roberts, Kirsten ­Fleming, Lauren Steussy, Dana Schuster and Wire Services

FAMILY SHADES MUM IN OBITUARY FOR ABANDONING KIDS TO LIVE WITH BROTHER-IN-LAW

Wednesday, 06 June 2018 09:15 Written by

A family shaded the heck out of their 80-year-old relative in a newspaper obituary because she left her husband and kids to go live with her brother in law.

Kathleen Dehmlow passed away last Thursday in Springfield, Minnesota. In an obituary published in a local newspaper, her family let it b known that she would not be missed at all. They went on to spill details about her life in the paper.

The obituary states that Kathleen married Dennis Dehmlow in 1957, and the couple had two children, Gina and Jay. Five years later she apparently "became pregnant by her husband’s brother Lyle Dehmlow and moved to California."

The obituary continues;
She abandoned her children, Gina and Jay, who were then raised by her parents in Clements, Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Schunk.

She passed away on May 31, 2018 in Springfield and will now face judgement.

She will not be missed by Gina and Jay, and they understand that this world is a better place without her."

The obituary has already been shared over 20,000 times on Twitter. Some social media users have slammed the family for the disrespectful tribute, while others are in support of the family for being truthful.

Culled from; https://www.torimill.com/2018/06/family-shades-mum-in-obituary-for-abandoning-husband-and-kids-to-live-with-brother-in-law.html
Source: Nairaland News

News Letter

Subscribe our Email News Letter to get Instant Update at anytime

About Oases News

OASES News is a News Agency with the central idea of diseminating credible, evidence-based, impeccable news and activities without stripping all technicalities involved in news reporting.