Saturday, 05 October 2024
USA & CANADA

USA & CANADA (870)

Latest News

U.S. executes 13th convict under Trump administration

Saturday, 16 January 2021 14:02 Written by

Since resuming federal executions last year after a 17-year hiatus, Mr Trump has overseen more executions than any U.S. president since the 19th century

The U.S. government on Saturday carried out the 13th and final federal execution under President Donald Trump’s administration.

The execution comes days before Mr Trump’s successor, Joe Biden, takes office with a promise to try to end the death penalty.

Dustin Higgs, 48, was pronounced dead at 1:23 a.m. EST (0623 GMT), the Federal Bureau of Prisons said in a statement.

The convict’s execution was the aftermath of a late-night Supreme Court ruling which cleared the way for the execution to proceed.

Since resuming federal executions last year after a 17-year hiatus, Mr Trump, a long-time proponent of capital punishment, has overseen more executions than any U.S. president since the 19th century.

Mr Higgs’ execution brings the number to three executions this week alone.

He was convicted and sentenced to death in 2001 for his role in the kidnapping and murder of three women on a federal wildlife reserve in Maryland in 1996.

The victims were Tanji Jackson, Tamika Black, and Mishann Chinn.

His accomplice, Willis Haynes, who confessed to shooting the women, was sentenced to life in prison in a separate trial. 

In his final words, Mr Higgs sounded calm and defiant at the Justice Department’s death chamber in its prison in Terre Haute, Indiana, a reporter who served as a media witness said.

“I’d like to say I am an innocent man,” he said before lethal injections were administered, mentioning the three women by name. “I did not order the murders.”

Some of his victims’ relatives attended, and a sister of Ms Jackson released a statement, although the Bureau of Prisons did not share the sister’s name.

“When the day is over, your death will not bring my sister and the other victims back,” the statement said. “This is not closure, this is the consequence of your actions,” she added.

Mr Higgs’ older sister, Alexa Cave, could be heard sobbing uncontrollably from a separate witness room as her brother died.

‘Unprecedented slaughter’

Shawn Nolan, one of Higgs’ lawyers, said in a statement: “The government completed its unprecedented slaughter of 13 human beings tonight by killing Dustin Higgs, a Black man who never killed anyone, on Martin Luther King’s birthday,

“Dustin spent decades on death row in solitary confinement helping others around him, while working tirelessly to fight his unjust convictions.”

The majority conservative Supreme Court’s ruling was consistent with earlier decisions.

It had dismissed all orders by lower courts delaying federal executions since they were resumed last year.

“This is not justice,” one of its members, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, wrote in dissent.

 

“After waiting almost two decades to resume federal executions, the Government should have proceeded with some measure of restraint to ensure it did so lawfully.

”When it did not, this Court should have. It has not.”

The federal government executed 10 people last year, more than three times as many as in the previous six decades.

This marks the first time that it had conducted more executions than all U.S. states combined, according to a database compiled by the Death Penalty Information Centre.
A minority of the country’s 50 states still carry out executions.

Before Trump became president, only three people had been executed by the federal government since 1963.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) called the execution of Mr Higgs the end of a “cruel, inhumane and lawless” spree by the federal government.

“President-elect Joe Biden has pledged to end the federal death penalty. He must honour that commitment,” Cassandra Stubbs, director of ACLU’s Capital Punishment Project said.

After a failed triple date with the three women, Messrs Higgs and Haynes offered to drive them home but instead took them to the Patuxent Research Refuge.

Prosecutors said Mr Higgs gave Mr Haynes a gun and told him to shoot the three women.

The disparity in their sentences was grounds for clemency, Mr Higgs’s lawyers had said.

Mr Higgs and another death row inmate, Corey Johnson, were diagnosed with COVID-19 in December.

But on Wednesday the Supreme Court rejected an order by a federal judge in Washington delaying their executions for several weeks to allow their lungs to heal.

The Justice Department executed Mr Johnson on Thursday night.

Ms Cave, Higgs’ sister, said she believed life in prison would have been a more just punishment.

“They don’t have freedom at all in any sense of the word,” she said in an interview on Friday, before Higgs was executed.

“What purpose does it serve to kill you? It brings nothing back,” she said.

(Reuters/NAN)

What’s next for Trump: Will he face charges after leaving office? Will he pardon himself?

Saturday, 16 January 2021 13:40 Written by

 

Donald Trump speaks to supporters hours before a violent attack on the U.S. Capitol. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Thomas Klassen, York University, Canada

Among the central pillars of American politics is that presidents accept electoral loss with dignity and generosity. At the same time, those defeated have not been hounded and jailed for their actions while in power.

This differs markedly from democracies like Brazil and South Korea, where defeated presidents have been regularly jailed when their opponents seize power.

By egging his supporters to storm Capitol Hill, Donald Trump unleashed forces that could terminate his presidency before Jan. 20, see him charged with crimes after leaving office and further tarnish the legacy he has sought so hard to create.

Trump finally committed to a “smooth, orderly and seamless transition of power” in a video message released more than 24 hours after the mayhem at the Capitol left at least five people dead.

 

But a question on the minds of many is why did he continue for so long to battle against the November election results?

A different man might have graciously accepted defeat in November when it was obvious Joe Biden had won. Freed from the need to pander to his ideological base, he could have used the last two months to lead the battle against the COVID-19 pandemic, heal wounds, burnish the Republican Party and show generosity to opponents.

The difference between politics and business

It may be that the first president in American history without prior political experience does not fully appreciate the differences between politics and business. In politics, winners and losers don’t crush each other or harm political traditions and institutions.

Long-time politicians of all parties know they will need each other in the future, and that ultimately they need to co-operate to govern a nation.

Police hold protesters at gunpoint as they lie on a marble floor.
U.S. Capitol Police hold protesters at gunpoint near the House Chamber inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Having blazed an unprecedented post-election path, Trump now faces the possibility that the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution will be invoked. Democratic leaders and even some Republicans are calling for it.

The 25th Amendment permits a president to be removed from office by the vice-president, plus a majority of the cabinet, or by the vice-president and a body established by Congress, if they determine the commander-in-chief is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.


Read more: How does the 25th Amendment work, and can it be used to remove Trump from office after US Capitol attack?


Taking the steps required by the constitutional amendment — especially the need for Vice-President Mike Pence, a Trump loyalist for more than four years, to invoke it — likely makes it a non-starter. Any formal effort to remove Trump less than two weeks before Biden’s inauguration could also cause even more ideological division in a country already on tenterhooks.

Pence looks down.
Pence officiates as a joint session of the House and Senate convenes to confirm the Electoral College votes cast in November’s presidential election after the raid on the Capitol by Trump supporters. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool)

In all of American history, no former president has been charged with criminal behaviour after a term in office. This is due to an unwritten understanding by the political elite that the office of the presidency and American politics could be diminished by such an action. Charging one former president with criminal wrongdoing may raise the likelihood of the next former president being charged as well for partisan reasons, creating a vicious circle.

At the moment, in keeping with American tradition, Trump has not been charged or indicted with any offence. However, once leaving office, there is at least one criminal investigation that will proceed in New York into one of his companies. Other possible investigations also could start.

Ford and Nixon

No president has pardoned himself while in power, and no president has sought a pre-emptive self-pardon for charges that have not yet been laid, as Trump is reportedly contemplating.

The closest situation occurred in 1974 when President Gerald Ford pardoned his predecessor, Richard Nixon, on charges of obstruction of justice.

In this January 1974 photo, Gerald Ford and House Speaker Carl Albert listen to Nixon deliver his State of the Union address.
In this January 1974 photo, Ford and House Speaker Carl Albert listen to Nixon deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in Washington. (AP Photo)

Any effort by Trump to invoke a self-pardon would run into the problem that he himself noted in mid-2018: “Why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?” A self-pardon, even if ultimately deemed constitutional, would tarnish the legacy of the president who sought it.

 

The increasing hyper-polarization of American politics and Trump’s outrageous behaviour may have tipped the scales on the protection granted by the political establishment to former presidents.

Biden and his supporters could conclude that Trump does need to be charged once his term is finished as a reprimand and warning for future office-holders.

Trump’s name would join Nixon’s

Conversely, if Trump investigations result in charges, the Biden administration could then issue a pardon in keeping with the precedent set by the Ford-Nixon arrangement.

This would preserve some of the dignity of the office of the president, while simultaneously serving to rebuke Trump by adding his name alongside the notorious Nixon’s as the only presidents pardoned. Ironically, Trump’s eventual fate and legacy might be in hands of the opponent he has so mercilessly dismissed.

Guardian News.

The consequences of Trump’s disruptions of one of the hallmarks of American politics — the peaceful and dignified transfer of power after an election — will have consequences for years to come. Future presidents will hopefully see the end of Trump’s single term as a lesson of what not to do.The Conversation

Thomas Klassen, Professor, School of Public Policy and Administration, York University, Canada

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The U.S. Capitol violence could happen in Canada — here are 3 ways to prevent it

Saturday, 16 January 2021 13:35 Written by

Far-right and ultra-nationalist groups, including the Northern Guard, Proud Boys and individuals wearing Soldiers of Odin patches, gathered to protest the government’s lawsuit settlement with Canadian torture victim Omar Khadr in Toronto in October 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Christopher Katsarov

Robert Danisch, University of Waterloo and William Keith, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Canadians should not view the recent mob violence in Washington as a uniquely American problem. The polarization that produced the hatred, violence and chaos unleashed by President Donald Trump’s followers on the U.S. Capitol is the product of specific forms of rhetoric — and they exist in Canada, too.

What will keep them from boiling over into violence?

We ought to worry when we see increasing political polarization, and we need to view Jan. 6, 2021, as a reminder that we’re not immune.

Words create worlds, and so violent rhetoric begets violent action. And rhetoric that clears the way for violence has been practised in the same specific ways for thousands of years. Mapping the world through “us versus them” divisions is one of the hallmark characteristics of fascism, the central feature of every Trump speech, and perhaps the best communication practice for inciting violence.


Read more: Extreme political polarization weakens democracy – can the US avoid that fate?


Once the world has been divided and mapped by the demarcation between “us” and “them,” what are known as ad baculum arguments — an appeal to force or intimidation — are often used to silence legitimate opposition. In addition, Trump and his followers use personal attacks and reification (treating another person as an object or a thing) to change the subject, delegitimize others in the public sphere and to strengthen the division between us and them.

These forms of speech are aided by hyperbole. Hyperbole is an intentional exaggeration, not designed to offer an accurate account but instead used to provoke a response and gain attention. These are the rhetorical tactics that lead to violence.

Similar tactics used in Canada

In Canada, you can find all of these on display by taking a cursory glance at the Rebel News website, or listening to Gavin McInnes, the Canadian founder of the Proud Boys organization that helped lead the insurrection in Washington and maintain a following here.

You can also hear the seeds of these kinds of rhetoric in Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole’s speeches and Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s comments on the campaign trail in 2018.

 

Violent rhetoric produces violence just as a crappy diet produces poor health. What’s the solution? What should we avoid and what should we add to our discursive diet?

Democracies require persuasion and deliberation to guide decision-making about public issues. When we see the use of us-versus-them rhetoric, appeals to force, personal attacks, reification and hyperbole, we need to realize that the person using that kind of speech has decided that they’re not interested in persuasion.

When, instead, communication practices are based on reason, respect and deep listening, we prioritize persuasion in our decision-making. We know that this kind of persuasion can help us make good decisions that lead to prosperity, freedom and equality. In other words, democracies thrive in the presence of forms of persuasion guided by the values of what we have called “strong civility” in our book Beyond Civility: The Competing Obligations of Citizenship.

When we reduce ourselves to ad hominen attacks, ad baculum threats of force and careless hyperbole, we opt out of the democratic ideal of learning to live well with others who are different from us. To opt out of such goals is to accelerate toward the violence and chaos we saw at the U.S. Capitol.

Facilitating co-operation

When we embrace the practices and strategies of strong civility instead, then we facilitate co-operation, collaboration and careful reasoning that can hold us together as a nation characterized by diversity. That allows us to make good decisions as we navigate complex collective problems.

The way to prevent what happened in the U.S. from happening in Canada is to consciously choose to avoid rhetoric that leads to violence and to practise strong civility instead. We do that in the same way we embrace a better diet:

  1. Stay alert: Learn to identify the actions, from subtle threats to reducing others to stereotypes.

  2. Make better choices: Choose to make arguments in good faith, treat others — even those who are wrong — as fully human, and resist the urge to increase polarization.

  3. Avoid junk food: Social media can be wonderful, but Twitter and Facebook are not set up to encourage respect, thoughtfulness and deliberation, perhaps best illustrated by the fact that both social media platforms have permanently suspended Trump since the insurrection. Instead they offer a unhealthy buffet of communication choices that encourage you to gorge on anger and scoring points. If you don’t or rarely go there, you won’t be tempted.

A man holds up a placard calling for Trump's impeachment through the sun roof of a car.
A man holds up a placard calling for Trump’s impeachment in Denver on Jan. 10, 2021. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

Conservative politics, both Canadian and American, have veered too far into the rhetoric of division that have fuelled events like the insurrection. We’ve moved too far away from the forms of strong civility necessary for life in a large, multicultural democracy.

Going too far down the path of division, with too heavy a reliance on the rhetorical techniques that fuel Trump and his supporters, can threaten both the delicate social fabric of our culture and the institutions of governance we’ve designed to manage our collective problems.

Some kinds of rhetoric can set fire to the world; we need to recognize them and choose instead the kinds of communication that fuel healthy democracies and secure the values of freedom and equality.

Robert Danisch, Associate Professor & Chair, Department of Communication Arts, University of Waterloo and William Keith, Professor, Rhetoric and Professional Communication, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Trump impeached a second time – but Trumpism will live on

Saturday, 16 January 2021 13:31 Written by

Trump yells while visiting a portion of the border wall in Alamo, Tex. on Jan. 12, 2021. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Henry Giroux, McMaster University

Just a week after the U.S. Capitol was attacked by his supporters, Donald Trump has become the first president of the United States to be impeached twice. But regardless of how Trump leaves the White House — the Senate won’t act on the impeachment before Joe Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20 — the domestic terrorism he has inspired will not end there.

Democrats in the House of Representatives — as did 10 brave Republicans, none of whom voted in favour of Trump’s first impeachment a year ago — made a compelling case for removing the president in the final days of his administration.

During Trump’s four years in office, lies, ignorance and a thirst for violence have desensitized America to the point where a right-wing mob could attack police in broad daylight, break into the U.S. Capitol and occupy the Senate chamber.

America no longer lives in the shadow of authoritarianism. It has tipped into the abyss.

The domestic terrorism of Jan. 6 will not end there. This was Trumpism in full bloom, in all its ignorance and lawlessness, proving again that fascism begins with language and ends with violence.

Trumpism is a new political formation, blending white supremacy, voter suppression, market fundamentalism and authoritarianism, and it will survive long after Trump leaves the White House.

The travesty in Washington had been building for years in the dark recesses of conspiracy theories, lies, the dark web, white rage and hatred of those its adherents consider “enemies of the people.”

The mob on Capitol Hill was reminiscent of thugs roaming the streets of Germany in the 1930s brutalizing dissenters and “others” in the deranged Nazi notion of racial and political cleansing.

Fanning the flames

Trump has fanned fascist impulses consistently through the language of violence and division, aided by right-wing media outlets such as Fox News and Breitbart.

The storming of the Capitol reaches far beyond Trump’s toxic personal politics, incompetency and corruption. Such violence —rooted in ultra-nationalism, xenophobia, white supremacy, systemic police violence and anti-immigration bigotry — has a long history in the U.S. It has lately been normalized as a right-wing populist movement, which Trump brought to the surface of American politics and has worn like a badge.


Read more: The fury in US cities is rooted in a long history of racist policing, violence and inequality


He came to power by seizing upon the fears of whites and white supremacists who imagined themselves under siege. Since then, he has deliberately energized those followers.

Trumpism refers less to a person than to a dangerous movement and social base.

As a new cultural and political construct, it merges a ruthless capitalist rationality, growing inequality and commitment to white nationalism. These forces have deep historical roots.

They have congealed under Trump into an emotionally charged, spectacularized and updated form of authoritarianism. He has merged it with the apparatus and regressive values of a cruel capitalism to undermine democratic institutions and values.

Political chasm

As an anti-democratic ethos, it has opened a political chasm in which any attempt to unify the nation appears almost impossible, creating a toxic breeding ground for violence, cruelty, exclusion and racial cleansing.

In plain view, Trump flouted, ignored and destroyed institutions of accountability. He degraded political speech. He openly used his office to enrich himself. He publicly courted dictators.

Trump smiles at North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
Trump meets with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un at the border village of Panmunjom in the Demilitarized Zone, South Korea, in June 2019. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

His extremist supporters, like the Proud Boys, seethe with racism. They value violence as the only remedy that can provide relief and gratification.

Trumpism is intent not only on capturing institutions of the state for personal and political gain, but also controlling language, media and popular culture as a way of emptying politics of substance and reducing it to spectacle.

Criticism has become “fake news” unworthy of serious reflection or analysis. Trumpism shreds shared values and national unity into distrust and fear. It disdainfully views the common good and democratic values as registers of weakness and resentment.

Molded in the crucible of populist, racist, and authoritarian nationalism, Trumpism produced a tsunami of repressive political, economic, and social policies.

Children caged

Children of undocumented immigrants were caged. Military forces were deployed to attack peaceful demonstrators in cities like Portland.

Trumpism pollinated politics, culture and everyday life with authoritarian impulses. Self-appointed militiamen patrolled the southern border and state governments waged wars on people of colour through voter suppression laws.

Near the end of Trump’s term, many Republicans boldly attempted to use fabricated allegations of fraud to overthrow the election.

Trumpism emerged from the wider crisis of neoliberalism, which could no longer lay claim to democratic values while accelerating wars and fostering an unprecedented degree of inequality of wealth and power.


Read more: What exactly is neoliberalism?


Trumpism is more of a cult than an ideology. Trump’s egregious bungling of the COVID-19 pandemic had profoundly lethal consequences, yet his actions did little to undermine his support, especially under the moral and political blackout legitimated by a Vichy-like Republican Party.

Trumpism is a giant disinformation machine that aims to colonize culture and public consciousness by emptying them of democratic values and destroying institutions that nurture critical thought and civic courage.

Lessons of history vanish

Making use of modern cultural constructs such as Twitter and Facebook and friendly media outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax and Breitbart, his efforts married power and civic illiteracy. The public sphere has become a barrage of bomb-like daily events that obliterate the space and time for contemplating the past, while freezing the present into a fragmented display of shock. Under such circumstances, the lessons of history disappear.

The logical outcome is a rush to the comfort of strongmen who offer the swindle of fulfilment.

Trump raises his fist as he steps off Air Force One.
Trump raises his fist as he steps off Air Force One upon arrival in Harlingen, Texas. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Trumpism defines power as immunity from the law. How else to explain the pardoning of grifters, political cronies and war criminals?

Until it is understood as a broad cultural crisis rather than simply as an economic and political crisis, Trumpism will continue to undermine the ability of individuals and institutions to think critically.

There is no democracy without an educated citizenry and no democracy can survive this glut of ignorance, fear, precarity, commercialization, concentration of power and illusion of freedom.

If Trumpism is to be resisted, America needs a new language, politics and sense of purpose.

In the aftermath of Trump’s second impeachment, Joe Biden’s administration must establish a national effort — criminal investigations, hearings, trials and public assemblies — to hold accountable those who committed crimes under the Trump regime and to educate the public.

The time has come for America to reclaim its utopian ideals of justice, compassion, freedom and equality.

Henry Giroux, Chaired professor for Scholarship in the Public Interest in the Department of English and Cultural Studies, McMaster University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

US crisis: President Trump blames his lawyer, Giuliani for impeachment

Friday, 15 January 2021 04:52 Written by

President Donald Trump has blamed his lawyer, Rude Giuliani for his second impeachment on Wednesday, according to CNN

The President has also told people to stop paying for the lawyer’s legal fees, according to the news network quoting a source.

CNN reports that though Trump’s aides were not clear if the President was serious about his instructions given he’s lashing out at nearly everyone after the events of his second impeachment.

 

Trump, who is US 45th President, became the first among them all to be impeached twice when the House of Representatives confirmed his impeachment on Wednesday, a week after he was accused of inciting his supporters to launch a deadly attack on US Capitol.

Trump was impeached by the House on a single charge of incitement of insurrection.

The attack was said to be the outgoing President’s push to stop the certification of Joe Biden by the Congress.

 

And the CNN reports that Trump has been blaming his longtime personal lawyer and many others for the predicament he now finds himself in.

The lawyer, who is expected to play a role in Trump’s impeachment defense, is said to have been left out of most conversations thus far.

One White House adviser told CNN that “everybody’s angry at everyone” inside the White House, with the President being upset because he thinks people are not defending him enough.

 

“He’s in self-pity mode,” the source said, with Trump complaining he’s been under siege for five years and he views this latest impeachment as a continuation of that.”

But many people close to the President view the current situation as different than his first impeachment.

“His actions led to here, no one else,” the White House adviser said, adding, “He instigated a mob to charge on the Capitol building to stop the certification, he’s not going to find a lot of sympathetic Republicans.”

Harold Bornstein, Trump’s ex-doctor dies

Friday, 15 January 2021 04:51 Written by
 
Harold Bornstein, President Donald Trump’s former personal physician, is dead.

Bornstein’s family announced his death in a statement.

He is survived by wife Melissa (Brown), daughter Alix, and sons, Robyn Bornstein, Joseph Bornstein, Jeremee, and Jackson.

The deceased was Trump’s doctor for more than three decades.

Ahead of the 2016 election, Bornstein stated that the President’s “physical strength and stamina are extraordinary”.

He added that if elected, Trump “will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.”

 

The American leader later dropped Bornstein after he revealed to The New York Times in 2017 that he prescribed hair loss medication.

Bornstein wondered why people made a big deal out of a drug to grow hair.

“It certainly was not a breach of medical trust to tell somebody they take Propecia to grow their hair. What’s the matter with that?” he told NBC News in 2018.

Those Asking Buhari to Impose Travel Ban On Trump Should Be Put in Monkey Cage - Fani-Kayode Blasts MURIC

Tuesday, 12 January 2021 10:36 Written by
An Islamic group has been labeled ignorant after it begged President Buhari to place travel ban on Donald Trump.
 
Femi Fani-Kayode
Femi Fani-Kayode
 
A former Minister of Aviation has lashed out at an Islamic organization, Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) for asking President Muhammadu Buhari to impose travel ban on President Donald Trump.
 
MURIC in a statement on Monday asked that Trump be sanctioned along with his key allies for their ignoble roles in the US 2020 presidential elections, particularly the storming of the Capitol.
 
But reacting, a former Minister of Aviation, Femi Fani-Kayode slammed MURIC for issuing such a statement calling for a travel ban on Trump.
 
According to him, those calling for travel ban should be put in a ‘Monkey cage and shipped to Saudi Arabia never to return to Nigeria’
 
The former minister on his Twitter page wrote: “Those that say we should put a travel ban on Donald Trump and stop him from coming to Nigeria ought to be tied in fetters, put in a monkey cage, shipped to Saudi Arabia and dumped in the slums of Riyadh from where they must never be allowed to return.
 
“Grow up and stop talking rubbish!
 
Meanwhile, Trump has been under heavy criticism after he was said to incited his supporters to attack the US Capitol in a bid to stop the certification of President-elect, Joe Biden’s win.

Joe Biden To Get ‘Presidential Escort’ To White House, Virtual Parade Instead Of Traditional Inaugural Festivities

Tuesday, 12 January 2021 01:21 Written by

President-elect Joe Biden won’t get a traditional inaugural parade down Pennsylvania Avenue after he takes the oath of office, but he will get a presidential escort to the White House.

Biden and incoming first lady Jill Biden will forgo the traditional inaugural parade on Jan. 20, the Presidential Inaugural Committee announced Sunday.

Instead, the Bidens will receive a presidential escort from 15th Street to the White House after his swearing-in on the West Front of the Capitol. The escort will include representatives of every branch of the military, including the U.S. Army Band, a Joint Service Honor Guard, and the Commander-in-Chief’s Guard and Fife and Drum Corps from the 3rd U.S. Infantry “The Old Guard.”

Planners have been looking for ways to continue many inaugural traditions while protecting the health and safety of Americans amid the deadly coronavirus pandemic.

Replacing the traditional inaugural parade with a presidential escort will allow Americans and the world to see the new first family arriving at the White House without attracting the large crowds that usually gather along Pennsylvania Avenue for the inaugural parade, the committee said.

“This is an exciting opportunity to work with Americans across the country to showcase President-elect Biden and Vice President-elect (Kamala) Harris’ steadfast commitment to a diverse, inclusive and unified nation,” said Tony Allen, the inaugural committee’s chief executive officer. “There are many grand traditions to the inaugural, and we plan to honor them by highlighting more of our nation’s people than ever before while keeping everyone safe.”

The inaugural parade isn’t going away completely.

A “virtual parade” will be televised and will feature performances in communities across the country. The parade will celebrate America’s heroes, highlight Americans from all walks of life in different states and regions, and reflect the country’s diversity, heritage and resilience, inaugural planners said.

Participants for the virtual parade will be announced in the coming weeks, but the inaugural committee said the programming will include musical acts, local bands, poets, dance troupes and others paying homage to America’s heroes on the frontlines of the pandemic.

“This innovative programming will keep people safe and use new ways to bring in Americans across the country — from rural towns and urban cities to younger and older Americans to everybody and everywhere in between,” said Maju Varghese, the committee’s executive director.

Participants will practice social distancing, and vigorous health and safety protocols will be in place, the inaugural committee said.

The 59th Inaugural Ceremonies will be smaller than in previous years because of the health risks posed by COVID-19. Biden and Harris will still take the oath of office on the Capitol’s West Front, and Biden will deliver an inaugural address that lays out his vision for beating the virus, building back better and bringing the country together.

Inaugural planners are urging Americans not to travel to Washington for the festivities but to participate in the celebration virtually.

Tickets for the ceremony will be limited. In the past, members of Congress have received around 200,000 tickets to distribute to their constituents. This year, they will be limited to tickets for themselves and one guest.

Rep. James Clyburn, co-chair of the Biden inaugural committee, said he expects a couple thousand people to attend. The platform for the swearing-in ceremony is already set up.

“We’re going to make sure that people participate in a way that will make them a part of the event, but keep them safe and healthy and comfortable,’’ he said, noting the usually “icy cold’’ weather.

“We’re going to do it in such a way that you will be a part of it, but you can stay warm at home in your pajamas and enjoy it,” he said.

After the swearing-in, Biden, Harris and their spouses will participate in a “Pass in Review” ceremony on the Capitol’s East Front with members of the military.

Pass in Reviews are a long-standing military tradition that reflects the peaceful transfer of power to a new commander-in-chief. The new president, hosted by the Commander of Joint Task Force-National Capital Region, will review the readiness of military troops.

Clyburn, who was the guest Sunday at Richard Prince’s Journal-isms Roundtable, said he doesn’t expect President Donald Trump to show up at the inauguration.

“That would come as a surprise to me if he were to attend,’’ he said. “It would be a pleasant surprise – if he didn’t.’’

Michael Collins covers the White House. Reach him on Twitter @mcollinsNEWS.

Contributing: Deborah Berry

News Letter

Subscribe our Email News Letter to get Instant Update at anytime

About Oases News

OASES News is a News Agency with the central idea of diseminating credible, evidence-based, impeccable news and activities without stripping all technicalities involved in news reporting.